(no subject)
Mar. 11th, 2004 10:32 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've been thinking lately about intellectual discourse. Aside from university education, I think we've become very dumbed down as a culture. I have intellectual discussions with my friends occasionally, but generally, people are more interested in things, rather than ideas. I think we tend to spend more time discussing every day life and experiences, rather than ideas.
I wonder if this has been the truth during all historical periods, or if it's only true now. As a result of advanced communications technology, we have greater ability to disseminate information. However, do we take advantage of this? Did people have more philosophical discussions in the past? Is the culture of "the salon" (and I don't mean the beauty salon") dead? Is the main purpose of art (films and books) to make us think and discuss these ideas?
Perhaps I need to go back to school.
I wonder if this has been the truth during all historical periods, or if it's only true now. As a result of advanced communications technology, we have greater ability to disseminate information. However, do we take advantage of this? Did people have more philosophical discussions in the past? Is the culture of "the salon" (and I don't mean the beauty salon") dead? Is the main purpose of art (films and books) to make us think and discuss these ideas?
Perhaps I need to go back to school.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 08:50 am (UTC)though hey, stitch & bitch essions seem to be gathering steam... maybe that's today's "salon"?
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 08:51 am (UTC)Utne Reader has also been a force in promoting the salon culture, both in real life and online.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 09:10 am (UTC)I think the culture of the salon was originally only for a very very select few--those who were rich enough to be both well-educated and not have to work for a living, or were students on their way to becoming well-educated. (For what it's worth, my great grandmother ran a salon in Vienna and when she emigrated to NY, her home there.)
I think that in college and university circles, there's still a lot of philosophical discussions, a lot of talk of movies, books, readings, etc. Once you graduate though, few live the life that can afford the free time to wax philosophical.
I know my college friends and I talked about this stuff in school. Now, looking back, I can't help but think we were just being pretenous. Now that we are in the world earning a living, our conversations take a different path--we talk about work, relationships, and take a more lighthearted approach to tv, books, movies. If we go to museums it's not to overwhelm others with our knowledge, or play at being intellectual. It's because we like art, sometimes because it's pretty, sometimes because it makes us think.
I work in a creative field, and deal with a lot of people who think of themselves as artistes. My take is a little more laid back than that. While they're certainly talented, I don't think the world will come to an end if someone doesn't think their book is Important with a capital I. I'd just rather that the buying public get enjoyment--or really, anything at all--out of it.
But as I said, I'm cynical. I like conversations, but (unlike what I thought my junior year) there are more important things in life than Sartre.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 09:20 am (UTC)I agree with your point about things being "Important", and I go to galleries for the same reason you do.
I'm just as apt to watch an indie film as a new piece of blockbuster schlock.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 09:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 09:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-03-11 12:32 pm (UTC)Maybe it's the people I spend my time with, but I am just as likely to have a conversation about John Locke now as I was in college. Then again, in college, I was just as likely to babble incoherently about Steel Magnolias as I am now.