Here's something I'd like to discuss....
Feb. 24th, 2009 09:44 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I have problems with the word "douchebag." I know that it's pejorative and that it is an acceptable insult, but to me, it's a bit out there. Why should I want to call someone something that has to do with cleaning a vagina? I'm not really in favour of the process of douching, since it seems pretty pointless, but the term "douche" or "douchebag" has always irritated me.
Does anyone else think that this insult is fairly sexist? Am I the only one who feels this way?
Does anyone else think that this insult is fairly sexist? Am I the only one who feels this way?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 04:55 pm (UTC)I also find, though, that it has tremendous force as an insult.
(shrugs)
Do I contradict myself? I contradict myself. I am vast, I contain multitudes...
Thinking about it, though, it's not the sexist aspect that is at the root of its insultive power -- it is, as you point out, the "uselessness" or, pointlessness, of the process and, ergo, the tool. By calling someone a douchebag, the connotation, to my mind, is that they're useless.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 04:57 pm (UTC)I also find, though, that it has tremendous force as an insult.
i would agree. it does bother me, and yet it often is the only word to describe so many people who bother me. i also for a very long time had problems with "pussy" being a connotation for weakness and yet i have just been unable to remove it from my vocabulary.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:19 pm (UTC)It probably says something about the entrenched nature of sexism in our society, but let's face it: a prick is a prick, there's no better term for him. And a bitch is a bitch. And a certain degree of insufferableness makes one a twat.
shrugs
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 04:57 pm (UTC)I'm not sure I buy it, but that is why the widespread acceptance of that insult even in the feminist blogosphere. I prefer Asshat, or even Assberet.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 08:37 pm (UTC)But yeah, I never touch it myself.
Plus, douche bag is sooooo 2007. It's all about the douche nozzle now.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:04 pm (UTC)Last New Years Eve, a friend of mine suggested trying to come up with a good replacement for douchebag that was a) not sexist, b) more acceptable in say, work company and c) just as satisfying to say. Thus, Chafe. Works quite well and is gender neutral.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:18 pm (UTC)Hmm...
Given the parameters, how about "toothbrush"? Or "hatbox"?
no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 05:27 pm (UTC)the term "douche" or "douchebag" has always irritated me.
Date: 2009-02-24 06:00 pm (UTC)I think that if the sexist hygiene industry had emerged with a widely-marketed product intended to wash and perfume men's sexual organs, its name would also find use as an epithet (don't be such a dongspritz! that's so wanglavy!), due to its necessary proximity to a taboo subject over the course of use. If such a product existed and its name was used as I speculate, would "douchebag" be any less offensive? Maybe not, but perhaps less sexist.
Clearly to avoid accusations of sexism in our offensive language, we ought to seek gender neutrality in the source of our insults. If we must call someone some kind of bag, why not a colostomy bag? Maybe an enema syringe! (Of course, these are hurtful to those whose digestive processes have become medicalized -- which is, one might say, lame.)
Re: the term "douche" or "douchebag" has always irritated me.
Date: 2009-02-25 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 06:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-24 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 02:36 am (UTC)it is actually one of my favorite cursewords.
i can see how it might be construed as sexist, but as an insult toward a certain strain of entitled, rich persons, i feel it has no equal in the lexicon.
no subject
Date: 2009-02-25 03:25 am (UTC)Personally, I just like calling people (men/women) a "wanker".
That said, I call tend to use the phrase "dumbass motherfucker" more than I probably should.