blue_lotus13: (Default)
[personal profile] blue_lotus13
I have problems with the word "douchebag." I know that it's pejorative and that it is an acceptable insult, but to me, it's a bit out there. Why should I want to call someone something that has to do with cleaning a vagina? I'm not really in favour of the process of douching, since it seems pretty pointless, but the term "douche" or "douchebag" has always irritated me.

Does anyone else think that this insult is fairly sexist? Am I the only one who feels this way?
From: [identity profile] reluctance.livejournal.com
How do you feel about calling someone a "scumbag" or "scuzzbucket", connoting a used condom (http://www.slate.com/id/2139453/)?

I think that if the sexist hygiene industry had emerged with a widely-marketed product intended to wash and perfume men's sexual organs, its name would also find use as an epithet (don't be such a dongspritz! that's so wanglavy!), due to its necessary proximity to a taboo subject over the course of use. If such a product existed and its name was used as I speculate, would "douchebag" be any less offensive? Maybe not, but perhaps less sexist.

Clearly to avoid accusations of sexism in our offensive language, we ought to seek gender neutrality in the source of our insults. If we must call someone some kind of bag, why not a colostomy bag? Maybe an enema syringe! (Of course, these are hurtful to those whose digestive processes have become medicalized -- which is, one might say, lame.)
From: [identity profile] donrickles.livejournal.com
HA!!! I'm totally going to start using dongspritz!

Profile

blue_lotus13: (Default)
lex

August 2015

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 09:41 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios