Canadian girl out and aboot

"These Girls"- Set in a small town in New Brunswick, it's the story of three girls who carry on with a married man, played by David Boreanaz (Angel on Buffy and Angel). Two of the girls (Caroline Dhavernas and Holly Lewis) find out their friend, played by former Much Music VJ Amanda Walsh is having an affair with him when they go to steal some of his pot crop. The whole thing plays out a bit like a funny, old school sort of French comedic romp, but much lighter. In the middle of the film, I started trying to analyse it in feminist terms, which was a grave mistake, as I spent about 15 minutes trying to figure out who was exploiting who, which lessened my enjoyment. Not a perfect film, but funny none the less. The biggest surprise was that I really enjoyed David Boreanaz. I had thought he was sort of a boring actor, but it turned out the character of Angel was just boring. David Boreanaz is quite funny, even though I had to struggle for a couple of minutes to get past the scene of Angel getting it on with Much Music VJ Amanda Walsh. Also, David Boreanaz has definitely been working out, and has amazing abs and a great ass in this film.

I also got to see this film with Hanson , who I was hoping would be at the theatre. I haven't seen a movie in a theatre with someone else for a long time, and I'd forgotten how nice it is to watch a movie in a theatre with a friend.

"Play"- This was a Chilean movie set in Santiago. It's the story of Cristina, a strange girl who works taking care of an old Hungarian man. Near the opening of the movie, she finds an abandoned briefcase in the trash. We find out that the briefcase belongs to Tristan, who is going through his own difficulties. For the next section of the film, the characters keep crossing paths, but never quite meet. There are all kinds of moments of bizarreness and magical realism. While I sometimes felt that the movie dragged a bit, I did like that I didn't know what was going to happen and I enjoyed the characters, especially Cristina, who had such wonderful expressive eyes. I also loved the use of sound in this film. Certain sounds and music were repeated in order to stress certain themes and emotions. The use of colour was also one of the most innovative things I've seen recently. Every scene was a gorgeous palette. The characters, backgrounds and every detail seemed so colourful and lush. This was quite a contrast to my memories of Santiago, as I remember it as a grey, dusty place full of concrete. (But I was there during the winter). Still, I enjoyed this film, and I think other people in the audience did too, because they were discussing it afterward. However, part of it could also have been the ambiguity of the ending.

I haven't had a chance to write about the master television class with Michael Oates Palmer, who wrote for the West Wing in Season 4. It was such a great and informative talk and got me all pumped up about writing.

I'll just bring up some of the interesting points of his talk. This is going to seem a big jumpy-

He started discussing the history of television, and how television was considered the poor bastard cousin of feature film writing. Then "The Sopranos" came along and started changing everything. Shows on HBO began catering to people who were college educated and more affluent, who were looking for a higher quality from tv. THe major networks started following and other shows began changing the television landscape. "THe West Wing" was the first show to tackle politics, and "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" took television to a whole other level, with its witty writing and strange plots. (There were cheers from the audience during this section).

During the early 2000s, comedy was pretty much dead, and all comedies were failing. It was during this time, and the impending writer's strike of 2001, that reality tv snuck in. However, reality tv has already had its time in the sun, and will never be as popular, since reality tv doesn't work well on re-runs and doesn't sell well on dvd.

There are a lot of cops, doctor and lawyer shows on tv because the stakes are very high in these areas. You're dealing with crime and punishment, law, retribution and life and death, and these are all themes which keep audiences watching. SHows about other industries have been attempted and failed. There was a show about high profile real estate agents, which no one watched because no one cared. SHows about fictional bands have never been successful either.

Personally, I don't really enjoy doctor, cop or lawyer shows, and this is because many of them tend to be "procedural dramas." Procedural dramas do not have major character arcs, and are not built around characters. A show like "Law and Order" is a procedural drama, because you can miss episodes, and the characters have not changed very much, while a show like "NYPD Blue" has definite changes in its major characters.

I am all about character, and learning about what a procedural drama is really made sense to me. "CSI" is considered a "procedural drama", and I can't pay attention to it at all becuase I just don't find that I care about the characters.

There were many shows that succeeded despite expectations. "Desparate Housewives" is basically a relationship drama, and one of the reasons that it was so successful was due to the fact that it was able to nab a lot of "Sex and the City's" viewers, who were looking for something new to watch when the show was ending.

No one really predicted that "Lost" would be as successful as it is. People weren't sure if audiences would enjoy such complex backstory.

Most of this year's television lineup is an attempt to reach out to the male viewers, who have been lost to computer games and sports channels. This is why we have so many shows like "Invasion", "Supernatural", "Prison Break" and all that kind of stuff.
***

Apparently some television creators do read the boards at http://www.televisionwithoutpity.com. Aaron Sorkin was reading the boards and then got pissed at some of his fans, who weren't understanding the plot lines. He wrote a retort to them, which turned out to be a bad idea.
****

Oates Palmer did some work in journalism and worked as a speech writer in New York before he joined the writing team of "The West Wing." I never considered it, but a background in journalism would definitely be an asset in a tv writing room. As a journalist, you learn how to write quickly, adhere to deadlines, find solutions to problems, and research as fast as you would run if the devil himself were after you.
Now I have another potential career to research...

I have learned that if you want to work in film, you must generally be very very goodlooking or very eccentric. It is best if you are a combination of both. Talking to people at the Trade Forum was fun, and gave me a look into what the people behind the scenes are like.

I have also decided that there are some wacked out volunteers. There was one woman who was pouting because she felt that someone else was stealing her job, and another one who was so high strung, panicky and stressed that I wanted to hold her down and cram some valium down her throat.

Anyway, I watched the production designer class yesterday. ( notes on the session )